Jump to content

Vagabond

Members
  • Posts

    1,777
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30

Posts posted by Vagabond

  1. But you know what I want to see on screen: Arianne :D (not on cast list though, but I hold my hopes high)

     

    Also the cast list suggest a flashback to maggie the frog. Which means they will finally explore some of (at least one) characters more speculative backstory.

     

    and Darkstar! He is of the night!

     

    I think we're going to see Arianne tho, they need more nudity now that Emilila Clarke won't go topless anymore

  2.  

    Stannis in the books is a lot less in thrall to Melisandre. He gives long speeches to Davos about how he doesn't believe in any gods but he's seen her power. Stannis and Davos are much closer in the books, and his decision to go north to give aid to the night's watch is much more of a heroic moment. Melisandre, while still creepy, is less evil and more ambiguous.

     

    It's apparent that the show runners don't like Stannis and see him as a villain. I think they don't like religion in general. This is a decent article (spoilers thru season 4). http://www.dailydot.com/fandom/stannis-baratheon-game-thrones/

    • Upvote 1
  3. Well, some characters are much much more important in the books than the show--Arya has as many chapters as any other character, and on the show, especially in season 2, she doesn't do much, same with jon snow up until this year. tywin lannister and the tyrells are much more prominent on the show than they are in the books.

     

    in terms of characterization changes, they've softened cersei for tv--she's much less sympathetic in the books. they've made stannis out to be some kind of jihadist when in the books he's more of a lawful neutral asshole. they've made tyrion much nicer than he is in the books*. but the main change is really the balance. around what, 70% of each season of game of thrones is conversations in king's landing, the books are not like that at all. you see how the riverlands were devasted by the war in arya and brienne's chapters. you learn some of the magical backstory in bran's chapters. there's a whole northern political plot that the show totally skips.

     

    *my big problem with omitting the jaime/tyrion confrontation is that it means tyrion has no real motivation to kill tywin. he kills tywin because tywin insulted the woman he just killed? inconsistent.

    • Upvote 2
  4. ... I think Dinklage's portrayal of Tyrion is easily the best part of the entire show. He's been good and believable when doing humour, when doing serious politics, when showing his inner turmoil and tragedy. And the trial scene was a rare tour de force, IMHO.

    Compare that with the blandness of Jon Snow, or how Daenerys is portrayed!

     

    I agree the character (and his journey) is the best part, or one of the best parts, of the show. But I fear we're never gonna see common ground on the actor's believability. To me, the trial scene was obviously an actor delivering lines; I don't get that with, say, Tywin. To be fair, Charles Dance (for example) is using an accent he's far more familiar with.

     

    And I consider Jon and Daenerys two of the best-acted parts on the show. They're essentially one-note characters, but that's the script, not the actors.

     

    Rory McCann did a cracking job in that episode.

     

    you're drunk bro go post in the drunk thread

×
×
  • Create New...